Logo: Welcome To PlanetQuo

Iran: The Next War





Download Google Video Player






"This notion that the United States is getting ready to attack Iran is simply ridiculous...having said that, all options are on the table"

George W. Bush - 22nd February 2005




Iran: The Next War

Written by James Bamford


I. The Israeli Connection

A few blocks off Pennsylvania Avenue, the FBI's eight-story Washington field office exudes all the charm of a maximum-security prison. Its curved roof is made of thick stainless steel, the bottom three floors are wrapped in granite and limestone, hydraulic bollards protect the ramp to the four-floor garage, and bulletproof security booths guard the entrance to the narrow lobby. On the fourth floor, like a tomb within a tomb, lies the most secret room in the $100 million concrete fortress—out-of-bounds even for special agents without an escort. Here, in the Language Services Section, hundreds of linguists in padded earphones sit elbow-to-elbow in long rows, tapping computer keyboards as they eavesdrop on the phone lines of foreign embassies and other high-priority targets in the nation's capital.

At the far end of that room, on the morning of February 12th, 2003, a small group of eavesdroppers were listening intently for evidence of a treacherous crime. At the very moment that American forces were massing for an invasion of Iraq, there were indications that a rogue group of senior Pentagon officials were already conspiring to push the United States into another war—this time with Iran.

A few miles away, FBI agents watched as Larry Franklin, an Iran expert and career employee of the Defense Intelligence Agency, drove up to the Ritz-Carlton hotel across the Potomac from Washington. A trim man of fifty-six, with a tangle of blond hair speckled gray, Franklin had left his modest home in Kearneysville, West Virginia, shortly before dawn that morning to make the eighty-mile commute to his job at the Pentagon. Since 2002, he had been working in the Office of Special Plans, a crowded warren of blue cubicles on the building's fifth floor. A secretive unit responsible for long-term planning and propaganda for the invasion of Iraq, the office's staffers referred to themselves as "the cabal." They reported to Douglas Feith, the third-most-powerful official in the Defense Department, helping to concoct the fraudulent intelligence reports that were driving America to war in Iraq.

Just two weeks before, in his State of the Union address, President Bush had begun laying the groundwork for the invasion, falsely claiming that Saddam Hussein had the means to produce tens of thousands of biological and chemical weapons, including anthrax, botulinum toxin, sarin, mustard and VX nerve agent. But an attack on Iraq would require something that alarmed Franklin and other neoconservatives almost as much as weapons of mass destruction: detente with Iran. As political columnist David Broder reported in The Washington Post, moderates in the Bush administration were "covertly negotiating for Iran to stay quiet and offer help to refugees when we go into Iraq."

Franklin—a devout neoconservative who had been brought into Feith's office because of his political beliefs—was hoping to undermine those talks. As FBI agents looked on, Franklin entered the restaurant at the Ritz and joined two other Americans who were also looking for ways to push the U.S. into a war with Iran. One was Steven Rosen, one of the most influential lobbyists in Washington. Sixty years old and nearly bald, with dark eyebrows and a seemingly permanent frown, Rosen was director of foreign-policy issues at Israel's powerful lobby, the American Israel Public Affairs Committee. Seated next to Rosen was AIPAC's Iran expert, Keith Weissman. He and Rosen had been working together closely for a decade to pressure U.S. officials and members of Congress to turn up the heat on Tehran.

Over breakfast at the Ritz-Carlton, Franklin told the two lobbyists about a draft of a top-secret National Security Presidential Directive that dealt with U.S. policy on Iran. Crafted by Michael Rubin, the desk officer for Iraq and Iran in Feith's office, the document called, in essence, for regime change in Iran. In the Pentagon's view, according to one senior official there at the time, Iran was nothing but "a house of cards ready to be pushed over the precipice." So far, though, the White House had rejected the Pentagon's plan, favoring the State Department's more moderate position of diplomacy. Now, unwilling to play by the rules any longer, Franklin was taking the extraordinary—and illegal—step of passing on highly classified information to lobbyists for a foreign state. Unable to win the internal battle over Iran being waged within the administration, a member of Feith's secret unit in the Pentagon was effectively resorting to treason, recruiting AIPAC to use its enormous influence to pressure the president into adopting the draft directive and wage war against Iran.

It was a role that AIPAC was eager to play. Rosen, recognizing that Franklin could serve as a useful spy, immediately began plotting ways to plant him in the White House—specifically in the National Security Council, the epicenter of intelligence and national-security policy. By working there, Rosen told Franklin a few days later, he would be "by the elbow of the president."

Knowing that such a maneuver was well within AIPAC's capabilities, Franklin asked Rosen to "put in a good word" for him. Rosen agreed. "I'll do what I can," he said, adding that the breakfast meeting had been a real "eye-opener."

Working together, the two men hoped to sell the United States on yet another bloody war. A few miles away, digital recorders at the FBI's Language Services Section captured every word.


II. The Guru And The Exile

In recent weeks, the attacks by Hezbollah on Israel have given neoconservatives in the Bush administration the pretext they were seeking to launch what former House Speaker Newt Gingrich calls "World War III." Denouncing the bombings as "Iran's proxy war," William Kristol of The Weekly Standard is urging the Pentagon to counter "this act of Iranian aggression with a military strike against Iranian nuclear facilities." According to Joseph Cirincione, an arms expert and the author of Deadly Arsenals: Nuclear, Biological and Chemical Threats, "The neoconservatives are now hoping to use the Israeli-Lebanon conflict as the trigger to launch a U.S. war against Syria, Iran or both."

But the Bush administration's hostility toward Iran is not simply an outgrowth of the current crisis. War with Iran has been in the works for the past five years, shaped in almost complete secrecy by a small group of senior Pentagon officials attached to the Office of Special Plans. The man who created the OSP was Douglas Feith, the undersecretary of defense for policy. A former Middle East specialist on the National Security Council in the Reagan administration, Feith had long urged Israel to secure its borders in the Middle East by attacking Iraq and Iran. After Bush's election, Feith went to work to make that vision a reality, putting together a team of neoconservative hawks determined to drive the U.S. to attack Tehran. Before Bush had been in office a year, Feith's team had arranged a covert meeting in Rome with a group of Iranians to discuss their clandestine help.

The meeting was arranged by Michael Ledeen, a member of the cabal brought aboard by Feith because of his connections in Iran. Described by The Jerusalem Post as "Washington's neoconservative guru," Ledeen grew up in California during the 1940s. His father designed the air-conditioning system for Walt Disney Studios, and Ledeen spent much of his early life surrounded by a world of fantasy. "All through my childhood we were an adjunct of the Disney universe," he once recalled. "According to family legend, my mother was the model for Snow White, and we have a picture of her that does indeed look just like the movie character."

In 1977, after earning a Ph.D. in history and philosophy and teaching in Rome for two years, Ledeen became the first executive director of the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs, a pro-Israel pressure group that served as a flagship of the neoconservative movement. A few years later, after Reagan was elected, Ledeen had become prominent enough to earn a spot as a consultant to the National Security Council alongside Feith. There he played a central role in the worst scandal of Reagan's presidency: the covert deal to provide arms to Iran in exchange for American hostages being held in Lebanon. Ledeen served as the administration's intermediary with Israel in the illegal-arms deal. In 1985, he met with Manucher Ghorbanifar, a one-time Iranian carpet salesman who was widely believed to be an Israeli agent. The CIA considered Ghorbanifar a dangerous con man and had issued a "burn notice" recommending that no U.S. agency have any dealings with him. Unfazed, Ledeen called Ghorbanifar "one of the most honest, educated, honorable men I have ever known." The two men brokered the arms exchange—a transaction that would result in the indictment of fourteen senior officials in the Reagan administration.

"It was awful—you know, bad things happened," Ledeen says now. "When Iran-Contra was over, I said, ?Boy, I'm never going to touch Iran again.' "

But in 2001, soon after he arrived at the Pentagon, Ledeen once again met with Ghorbanifar. This time, instead of selling missiles to the Iranian regime, the two men were exploring how best to topple it.

"The meeting in Rome came about because my friend Manucher Ghorbanifar called me up," Ledeen says. Stout and balding, with a scruffy white beard, Ledeen is sitting in the living room of his white-brick home in Chevy Chase, Maryland, smoking a Dominican cigar. His Airedale terrier, Thurber, roams the room protectively. In his first extensive interview about the covert Pentagon operation, Ledeen makes no secret of his desire to topple the government in Tehran. "I want to bring down the regime," he says. "I want the regime gone. It's a country that is fanatically devoted to our destruction."

When Ghorbanifar called Ledeen in the fall of 2001, he claimed, as he often does, to have explosive intelligence that was vital to U.S. interests. "There are Iranians who have firsthand information about Iranian plans to kill Americans in Afghanistan," he told Ledeen. "Does anyone want to hear about it?"

Ledeen took the information to Stephen Hadley, the deputy national security adviser at the White House. "I know you're going to throw me out of the office," Ledeen told him, "and if I were you I would throw me out of the office too. But I promised that I would give you this option. Ghorbanifar has called me. He said these people are willing to come. Do you want anybody to go and talk to them?"

Hadley was interested. So was Zalmay Khalilzad, then the point man on Near East issues for the National Security Council and now the U.S. ambassador to Baghdad. "I think we have to do this, we have to hear this," Hadley said. Ledeen had the green light: As he puts it, "Every element of the American government knew this was going to happen in advance."


III. The Meeting In Rome

Weeks later, in December, a plane carrying Ledeen traveled to Rome with two other members of Feith's secret Pentagon unit: Larry Franklin and Harold Rhode, a protégé of Ledeen who has been called the "theoretician of the neocon movement." A specialist on Islam who speaks Hebrew, Arabic, Turkish and Farsi, Rhode had experience with shady exiles like Ghorbanifar: He was close to Ahmed Chalabi, the Iraqi dissident whose discredited intelligence helped drive the Bush administration to invade Baghdad. According to UPI, Rhode himself was later observed by CIA operatives passing "mind-boggling" intelligence to Israel, including sensitive information about U.S. military deployments in Iraq.

Completing the rogues' gallery that assembled in Rome that day was the man who helped Ledeen arrange the meeting: Nicolò Pollari, the director of Italy's military intelligence. Only two months earlier, Pollari had informed the Bush administration that Saddam Hussein had obtained uranium from West Africa—a key piece of false intelligence that Bush used to justify the invasion of Iraq.

To hide the shadowy rendezvous in Rome, Pollari provided a well-protected safe house near the noisy espresso bars and busy trattorias that surround the Piazza di Spagna in central Rome. "It was in a private apartment," Ledeen recalls. "It was fucking freezing—it was unheated." The Pentagon operatives and the men from Iran sat at a dining-room table strewn with demitasse cups of blackish coffee, ashtrays littered with crushed cigarette butts and detailed maps of Iran, Iraq and Syria. "They gave us information about the location and plans of Iranian terrorists who were going to kill Americans," Ledeen says.

Ledeen insists the intelligence was on the mark. "It was true," he says. "The information was accurate." Not according to his boss. "There wasn't anything there that was of substance or of value that needed to be pursued further," Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld later conceded. "It went nowhere."

The men then turned their attention to their larger goal: regime change in Iran. Ghorbanifar suggested funding the overthrow of the Iranian government using hundreds of millions of dollars in cash supposedly hidden by Saddam Hussein. He even hinted that Saddam was hiding in Iran.

Ledeen, Franklin and Rhode were taking a page from Feith's playbook on Iraq: They needed a front group of exiles and dissidents to call for the overthrow of Iran. According to sources familiar with the meeting, the Americans discussed joining forces with the Mujahedin-e Khalq, an anti-Iranian guerrilla army operating out of Iraq.

There was only one small problem: The MEK had been certified by the State Department as a terrorist organization. In fact, the White House was in the midst of negotiations with Tehran, which was offering to extradite five members of Al Qaeda thought to be of high intelligence value in return for Washington's promise to drop all support for the MEK.

Ledeen denies any dealings with the group. "I wouldn't get within a hundred miles of the MEK," he says. "They have no following, no legitimacy." But neoconservatives were eager to undermine any deal that involved cooperating with Iran. To the neocons, the value of the MEK as a weapon against Tehran greatly outweighed any benefit that might be derived from interrogating the Al Qaeda operatives—even though they might provide intelligence on future terrorist attacks, as well as clues to the whereabouts of Osama bin Laden.

Ledeen and his Pentagon cabal were not the only American officials to whom Ghorbanifar tried to funnel false intelligence on Iran. Last year, Rep. Curt Weldon, a Republican from Pennsylvania, claimed he had intelligence—from an "impeccable clandestine source" he code-named "Ali"—that the Iranian government was plotting to launch attacks against the United States. But when the CIA investigated the allegations, it turned out that Ali was Fereidoun Mahdavi, an Iranian exile who was serving as a frontman for Ghorbanifar and trying to shake down the CIA for $150,000. "He is a fabricator," said Bill Murray, the former CIA station chief in Paris. Weldon was furious: The agency had dismissed Ali, he insisted, "because they want to avoid, at all costs, drawing the United States into a war with Iran."

After the Rome rendezvous, Ledeen and Ghorbanifar continued to meet several times a year, often for a day or two at a time. Rhode also met with Ghorbanifar in Paris, and the Iranian phoned or faxed his Pentagon contacts almost every day. At one point Ledeen notified the Pentagon that Ghorbanifar knew of highly enriched uranium being moved from Iraq to Iran. At another point, in 2003, he claimed that Tehran was only a few months away from exploding a nuclear bomb—even though international experts estimate that Iran is years away from developing nuclear weapons. But the accuracy of the reports wasn't important—what mattered was their value in drumming up support for war. It was Iraq all over again.


IV. On the Trail Of Mr. X

Such covert efforts by Feith's team in the Pentagon started to have the desired effect. In November 2003, Rumsfeld approved a plan known as CONPLAN 8022-02, which for the first time established a pre-emptive-strike capability against Iran. That was followed in 2004 by a top-secret "Interim Global Strike Alert Order" that put the military on a state of readiness to launch an airborne and missile attack against Iran, should Bush issue the command. "We're now at the point where we are essentially on alert," said Lt. Gen. Bruce Carlson, commander of the 8th Air Force. "We have the capacity to plan and execute global strikes in half a day or less."

But as the Pentagon moved the country closer to war with Iran, the FBI was expanding its investigation of AIPAC and its role in the plot. David Szady, then the bureau's top spy-catcher, had become convinced that at least one American citizen working inside the U.S. government was spying for Israel. "It's no longer just our traditional adversaries who want to steal our secrets, but sometimes even our allies," Szady declared. "The threat is incredibly serious." To locate the spy sometimes referred to as Mr. X, agents working for Szady began focusing on a small group of neoconservatives in the Pentagon—including Feith, Ledeen and Rhode.

The FBI also had its sights on Larry Franklin, who continued to hold clandestine meetings with Rosen at AIPAC. Apparently nervous that the FBI might be on to them, the two men started taking precautions. On March 10th, 2003, barely a week before the invasion of Iraq, Rosen met Franklin in Washington's cavernous Union Station. The pair met at one restaurant, then they hustled to another, and finally they ended up in a third—this one totally empty. As an added precaution, Franklin also began sending faxes to Rosen's home instead of to his AIPAC offices.

A few days later, Rosen and Weissman passed on to Israeli-embassy officials details about the draft of the top-secret presidential directive on Iran, saying they had received the document from a "friend of ours in the Pentagon." They also relayed to the Israelis details about internal Bush-administration discussions on Iran. Then, two days before the U.S. invasion of Iraq, Rosen leaked the information to the press with the comment "I'm not supposed to know this." The Washington Post eventually published the story under the headline "Pressure Builds for President to Declare Strategy on Iran," crediting the classified information to "well-placed sources." The story mentioned Ledeen, who helped found the Coalition for Democracy in Iran, a pressure group dedicated to the overthrow of the Iranian government, but gave no indication that the leak had come from someone with a definite agenda for planting the information.

That June, Weissman called Franklin and left a message that he and Rosen wanted to meet with him again and talk about "our favorite country." The meeting took place in the Tivoli Restaurant, a dimly lit establishment two floors above the metro station in Arlington that was frequently used by intelligence types for quiet rendezvous. Over lunch in the mirrored dining room, the three men discussed the Post article, and Rosen acknowledged "the constraints" Franklin was under to meet with them. But the Pentagon official placed himself fully at AIPAC's disposal. "You set the agenda," Franklin told Rosen.

In addition to meeting Rosen and Weissman, Franklin was also getting together regularly with Naor Gilon, an Israeli embassy official who, according to a senior U.S. counterintelligence official, "showed every sign of being an intelligence agent." Franklin and Gilon would normally meet amid the weight machines and punching bags at the Pentagon Officers Athletic Club, where Franklin passed along secret information regarding Iran's activities in Iraq, its missile-testing program and even, apparently, New York Times reporter Judith Miller. At one point, Gilon suggested that Franklin meet with Uzi Arad, Mossad's former director of intelligence and former Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's foreign-policy adviser. A week later, Franklin had lunch in the Pentagon cafeteria with the former top Israeli spy.

V. Iran's Double Agent

Larry Franklin, it turns out, wasn't the only person involved in the Pentagon's covert operation who was exchanging state secrets with other governments. As the FBI monitored Franklin and his clandestine dealings with AIPAC, it was also investigating another explosive case of espionage linked to Feith's office and Iran. This one focused on Ahmed Chalabi, the head of the Iraqi National Congress, the militant anti-Saddam opposition group that had worked for more than a decade to pressure the U.S. into invading Iraq.

For years, the National Security Agency had possessed the codes used by Iran to encrypt its diplomatic messages, enabling the U.S. government to eavesdrop on virtually every communication between Tehran and its embassies. After the U.S. invaded Baghdad, the NSA used the codes to listen in on details of Iran's covert operations inside Iraq. But in 2004, the agency intercepted a series of urgent messages from the Iranian embassy in Baghdad. Intelligence officials at the embassy had discovered the massive security breach—tipped off by someone familiar with the U.S. code-breaking operation.

The blow to intelligence-gathering could not have come at a worse time. The Bush administration suspected that the Shiite government in Iran was aiding Shiite insurgents in Iraq, who were killing U.S. soldiers. The administration was also worried that Tehran was secretly developing nuclear weapons. Now, crucial intelligence that might have shed light on those operations had been cut off, potentially endangering American lives.

On May 20th, shortly after the discovery of the leak, Iraqi police backed by American soldiers raided Chalabi's home and offices in Baghdad. The FBI suspected that Chalabi, a Shiite who had a luxurious villa in Tehran and was close to senior Iranian officials, was actually working as a spy for the Shiite government of Iran. Getting the U.S. to invade Iraq was apparently part of a plan to install a pro-Iranian Shiite government in Baghdad, with Chalabi in charge. The bureau also suspected that Chalabi's intelligence chief had furnished Iran with highly classified information on U.S. troop movements, top-secret communications, plans of the provisional government and other closely guarded material on U.S. operations in Iraq. On the night of the raid, The CBS Evening News carried an exclusive report by correspondent Lesley Stahl that the U.S. government had "rock-solid" evidence that Chalabi had been passing extremely sensitive intelligence to Iran—evidence so sensitive that it could "get Americans killed."

The revelation shocked Franklin and other members of Feith's office. If true, the allegations meant that they had just launched a war to put into power an agent of their mortal enemy, Iran. Their man—the dissident leader who sat behind the first lady in the president's box during the State of the Union address in which Bush prepared the country for war—appeared to have been working for Iran all along.

Franklin needed to control the damage, and fast. He was one of the very few in the government who knew that it was the NSA code-breaking information that Chalabi was suspected of passing to Iran, and that there was absolute proof that Chalabi had met with a covert Iranian agent involved in operations against the U.S. To protect those in the Pentagon working for regime change in Tehran, Franklin needed to get out a simple message: We didn't know about Chalabi's secret dealings with Iran.

Franklin decided to leak the information to a friendly contact in the media: Adam Ciralsky, a CBS producer who had been fired from the CIA, allegedly for his close ties to Israel. On May 21st, the day after CBS broadcast its exclusive report on Chalabi, Franklin phoned Ciralsky and fed him the information. As the two men talked, eavesdroppers at the FBI's Washington field office recorded the conversation.

That night, Stahl followed up her original report with "new details"—the information leaked earlier that day by Franklin. She began, however, by making clear that she would not divulge the most explosive detail of all: the fact that Chalabi had wrecked the NSA's ability to eavesdrop on Iran. "Senior intelligence officials were stressing today that the information Ahmed Chalabi is alleged to have passed on to Iran is so seriously sensitive that the result of full disclosure would be highly damaging to U.S. security," Stahl said. "Because of that, we are not reporting the details of what exactly Chalabi is said to have compromised, at the request of U.S. officials at the highest levels. The information involves secrets that were held by only a handful of very senior intelligence officials." Thanks to the pressure from the administration, the public was prevented from learning the most damaging aspect of Chalabi's treachery.

Then Stahl moved on to Franklin's central message. "Meanwhile," she said, "we have been told that grave concerns about the true nature of Chalabi's relationship with Iran started after the U.S. obtained 'undeniable intelligence' that Chalabi met with a senior Iranian intelligence officer, a 'nefarious figure from the dark side of the regime, an individual with a direct hand in covert operations against the United States.' Chalabi never reported this meeting to anyone in the U.S. government, including his friends and sponsors." In short, the Pentagon—and Feith's office in particular—was blameless.


VI. The Cabal's Triumph

Soon after the broadcast, David Szady's team at the FBI decided to wrap up its investigation before Franklin leaked any more information. Agents quietly confronted Franklin with the taped phone call and pressured him to cooperate in a sting operation directed at AIPAC and members of Feith's team in the Pentagon. Franklin, facing a long prison sentence, agreed. On August 4th, 2005, Rosen and Weissman were indicted, and on January 20th, 2006, Franklin, who had earlier pleaded guilty, was sentenced to twelve years and seven months in prison. In an attempt to reduce his sentence, he agreed to testify against the former AIPAC officials. The case is set to go to trial this fall.

So far, however, Franklin is the only member of Feith's team to face charges. The continuing lack of indictments demonstrates how frighteningly easy it is for a small group of government officials to join forces with agents of foreign powers—whether it is AIPAC or the MEK or the INC—to sell the country on a disastrous war.

The most glaring unindicted co-conspirator is Ahmed Chalabi. Even top-ranking Republicans suspect him of double dealing: "I wouldn't be surprised if he told Iranians facts, issues, whatever, that we did not want them to know," said Rep. Chris Shays, R-Conn., who chairs the House subcommittee on national security. Yet the FBI has been unable to so much as question Chalabi as part of its ongoing espionage case. Last November, when Chalabi returned to the United States for a series of speeches and media events, the FBI tried to interview him. But because he was under State Department protection during his visit, sources in the Justice Department say, the bureau's request was flatly denied.

"Chalabi's running around saying, ?I have nothing to hide,' " says one senior FBI official. "Yet he's using our State Department to keep us from him at the same time. And we've got to keep our mouth shut."

In the end, the work of Franklin and the other members of Feith's secret office had the desired effect. Working behind the scenes, the members of the Office of Special Plans succeeded in setting the United States on the path to all-out war with Iran. Indeed, since Bush was re-elected to a second term, he has made no secret of his desire to see Tehran fall. In a victory speech of sorts on Inauguration Day in January 2005, Vice President Dick Cheney warned bluntly that Iran was "right at the top" of the administration's list of "trouble spots"—and that Israel "might well decide to act first" by attacking Iran. The Israelis, Cheney added in an obvious swipe at moderates in the State Department, would "let the rest of the world worry about cleaning up the diplomatic mess afterward."

Over the past six months, the administration has adopted almost all of the hard-line stance advocated by the war cabal in the Pentagon. In May, Bush's ambassador to the United Nations, John Bolton, appeared before AIPAC's annual conference and warned that Iran "must be made aware that if it continues down the path of international isolation, there will be tangible and painful consequences." To back up the tough talk, the State Department is spending $66 million to promote political change inside Iran—funding the same kind of dissident groups that helped drive the U.S. to war in Iraq. "We may face no greater challenge from a single country than from Iran," Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice declared.

In addition, the State Department recently beefed up its Iran Desk from two people to ten, hired more Farsi speakers and set up eight intelligence units in foreign countries to focus on Iran. The administration's National Security Strategy—the official policy document that sets out U.S. strategic priorities—now calls Iran the "single country" that most threatens U.S. interests.

The shift in official policy has thrilled former members of the cabal. To them, the war in Lebanon represents the final step in their plan to turn Iran into the next Iraq. Ledeen, writing in the National Review on July 13th, could hardly restrain himself. "Faster, please," he urged the White House, arguing that the war should now be taken over by the U.S. military and expanded across the entire region. "The only way we are going to win this war is to bring down those regimes in Tehran and Damascus, and they are not going to fall as a result of fighting between their terrorist proxies in Gaza and Lebanon on the one hand, and Israel on the other. Only the United States can accomplish it," he concluded. "There is no other way."



Israel's Bad Influence

Brainwashed Blair Shows True Colour

Blair Labels Iran As Main Foe

Blair Was Dangerously Off Target In His Condemnation Of Iran

You're Attacking The Wrong Nation Mr. Blair

Is War In The Script For Iran? The British Media Appears To Be Softening Us Up For An Attack On Iran
Are We Going To War With Iran?

Britain Took Part In Mock Iran Invasion

Government In Secret Talks About Strike Against Iran

Rule From The Shadows - Bibi Is Back

Israel's War, Says Bibi, Must Be Sold As America's War

Netanyahu: It's 1938 And Iran Is Germany; Ahmadinejad Is Preparing Another Holocaust

Netanyahu To Ambassadors: It's 1938 Again

Netanyahu Issues Call To World From Jerusalem Conference

Israel: Iraq 'Not Enough' - Wants US To Take Syria, Iran

Time To Focus On Iran - The Mother Of Modern Terrorism



Ahmadinejad's Letter To Bush

Ahmadinejad's Letter To Americans

Is Iran's President Really A Jew-hating, Holocaust-Denying Islamo-Fascist Who Has Threatened To Wipe Israel Off The Map?

Lost In Translation

"Wiped Off The Map" - The Rumor Of The Century

Netanyahu Wants Iran President Tried For Genocide At The Hague

Israel Mulls Genocide Suit Against Iran President

"I do not even shrink from a statement that is not going to make me popular in Germany: if the Germans destabilize Europe anew, in some way or other, then partition is no longer what will have to be resorted to, but rather that country will have to be erased from the map, pure and simple. East and West have at their disposal the advanced technology necessary to carry this verdict out."

Lech Walesa

Polish Prime Minister And 1983 Nobel Peace Prize Laureate

(Quoted from an interview published on 7th April 1990 in Elsevier)

Designer Monsters

Iran: A Manufactured Crisis

Israel Reports Weapons Development in Iran, Iraq

No Proof Of Iran Nuclear Arms

IAEA Report Shows No Nuclear Activity In Tehran

The Iranian Threat: The Bomb Or The Euro?

America, Iran, And Operation Ajax: The Burden Of The Past

The Spectre Of Operation Ajax

Mohammad Mosaddeq And The 1953 Coup In Iran

Mossadeq And Oil Nationalization

Secrets Of History: The CIA In Iran

Tehran Insider Tells Of US Black Ops

US Special Forces Inside Iran

SAS In Secret War Against Iranian Agents

Retired Colonel Claims US Military Operations Are Already 'Underway' In Iran

US Forces Fighting Iranians In Iraq

Deja Vu: George W. Bush - US Won't Attack Iran"

Deja Vu: George W. Bush - US Iran Attack 'Ridiculous'

US Denies Military Plans Against Iran

Secret US Air Force Team To Perfect Plan For Iran Strike

Pentagon 'Three-Day Blitz' Plan For Iran

War With Iran Has Already Begun

Britain And US To Add Ships To Persian Gulf In Signal To Iran

Second US Carrier Group To Deploy To Gulf

US Submarine Collides With Tanker

US Sends Warplanes To Turkey's Incirlik Military Base

Israel Plans Nuclear Strike On Iran Over Turkey

Ramifications of Coming Attack On Iran For Israel

Distracting Congress From The Real War Plan: Iran

After The Surge...What Next?

Bush's Tough Tactics Are A Declaration Of War On Iran

US Threatens Iran As Troops Plan Attacked

US Accuses Iran Of Arming Iraqi Insurgents

US Warns Iran On Iraq 'Meddling'

War With Iran Is Imminent

A Very Dangerous New Year


"The terror attacks on September 11th and extreme turmoil in the Middle East point to one thing - World War III. September 11th was a watershed event, and things will never be the same. The battle lines have been drawn."

Ariel Sharon - 14th March 2003





"It's very good...Well, it's not good, but it will generate immediate sympathy for Israel"

Former Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu

(After being asked what the 9-11 attacks would mean for US-Israeli relations)

12th September 2001




World War III Escalates, Theatre Expands, Tensions Mount

Written by Denny Derda

This week will go down in history when an American President and his Administration, against the will of the American people and that of the international community, took World War III (War on Terror, World War IV) to the next level. The theatre of war in this conflict, perpetuated by the criminal governments of Israel, the United States, and the United Kingdom, expanded further to include Somalia, Iran, and Syria.

Many thought that the latest Bush, and thus Neo-Conservative, strategy to increase more troops was a diversionary tactic meant to fail while not decreasing the current number of troops currently in Iraq, as increasing the number of troops in Iraq is absolutely insane. It has become quite clear however, that the Neo-Conservative's ARE absolutely insane (if you didn't already know that) and that instead of being humbled by the bog the greatest military on Earth currently finds itself in at the hands of an insurgency in a country the size of California, they have decided to press on with their mission: world conquest no matter the cost. The global scorched-Earth policy of the Neo-Crazies should now be clear to everyone including those that thought the only reason the War has gone so badly was because of Rumsfeld and now being ratcheted up, is because of a delusional and stupid President Bush. This is a completely false and disingenuous rationale as it fails to acknowledge that many people are in fact controlling this policy from the White House, the Pentagon, and the Department of Defense et. al. This train of thought will subsequently allow all the Neo-Conservatives and other complicit criminals to get off the hook while Bush's sanity will be blamed for America's demise. In the way the Nuremberg Trials gouged out the Nazi cancer and implicated the enablers, the people making the weapons and making the horrors of World War II possible, we too must acknowledge that there are others involved in this criminally insane venture of wanton death and destruction and bring them to justice.

War Is Declared On Iran And Syria





The threats against Iran specifically with the deployment of 20,000 additional troops, the deployment of Patriot Missile batteries to Iraq, the raid on the Iranian liaison (was in the process of becoming a consulate) in the Northern Kurdish controlled city of Irbil, and the dispatch of another aircraft carrier battle group to the Gulf are provocations and direct Acts of War. Would the United States not say the same should Russia take similar action in Cuba? It is quite clear from these actions that the United States intends to widen the theatre of war.

Patriot Missiles - Bombs Over Baghdad

The deployment of Patriot Missile systems to Iraq can be seen as a harbinger for an attack on Iran. As Army-Technology tells us:

"Patriot is a long-range, all-altitude, all-weather air defence system to counter tactical ballistic missiles, cruise missiles and advanced aircraft. Patriot (MIM-104) is produced by Raytheon in Massachusetts and Lockheed Martin Missiles and Fire Control in Florida.

Patriot missile systems were deployed by US forces during Operation Iraqi Freedom. The systems were stationed in Kuwait and successfully destroyed a number of hostile surface-to-surface missiles using the new PAC-3 and guidance enhanced missiles."


As you can see, the Patriot missile is an "air defence system to COUNTER" an attack. It is clear that only country in the vicinity to launch cruise missiles or other surface-to-surface missiles would be Iran. What makes the Bush administration believe that Iran would launch surface-to-surface missiles since they haven't the entire occupation of Iraq? Obviously, the American and Israeli administrations have war in mind for the people of Iran. From Seymour Hersh:

"The Bush Administration, while publicly advocating diplomacy in order to stop Iran from pursuing a nuclear weapon, has increased clandestine activities inside Iran and intensified planning for a possible major air attack. Current and former American military and intelligence officials said that Air Force planning groups are drawing up lists of targets, and teams of American combat troops have been ordered into Iran, under cover, to collect targeting data and to establish contact with anti-government ethnic-minority groups. The officials say that President Bush is determined to deny the Iranian regime the opportunity to begin a pilot program, planned for this spring, to enrich uranium.

One former defense official, who still deals with sensitive issues for the Bush Administration, told me that the military planning was premised on a belief that "a sustained bombing campaign in Iran will humiliate the religious leadership and lead the public to rise up and overthrow the government." He added, "I was shocked when I heard it, and asked myself, 'What are they smoking?'"


One of the military’s initial option plans, as presented to the White House by the Pentagon this winter, calls for the use of a bunker-buster tactical nuclear weapon, such as the B61-11, against underground nuclear sites. One target is Iran’s main centrifuge plant, at Natanz, nearly two hundred miles south of Tehran. Natanz, which is no longer under I.A.E.A. safeguards, reportedly has underground floor space to hold fifty thousand centrifuges, and laboratories and workspaces buried approximately seventy-five feet beneath the surface.

And from the the London Sunday Times:

"Israel has drawn up secret plans to destroy Iran’s uranium enrichment facilities with tactical nuclear weapons.

Israel has drawn up secret plans to destroy Iran’s uranium enrichment facilities with tactical nuclear weapons.

Two Israeli air force squadrons are training to blow up an Iranian facility using low-yield nuclear “bunker-busters”, according to several Israeli military sources.

Israeli military commanders believe conventional strikes may no longer be enough to annihilate increasingly well-defended enrichment facilities. Several have been built beneath at least 70ft of concrete and rock. However, the nuclear-tipped bunker-busters would be used only if a conventional attack was ruled out and if the United States declined to intervene, senior sources said."


An American and/or Israeli attack of conventional and/or nuclear munitions, will no doubt lead to retaliation by Iran hence the deployment of the Patriot Missile systems in Iraq.

A tactical-nuclear weapon used anywhere near a population center, such as the case in Iran, would kill tens-of-thousands instantly and many more from the fallout.

The obvious targets for an Iranian rocket-retaliation would be Baghdad as many of the US forces are stationed there, not to mention the expansive and sprawling Green Zone; Israel is a target as well. Patriot missiles in Iraq would be able to hypothetically defend both retaliatory targets.

20,000 Troops - Double Or Nothing

The stated purpose of the troop increase in Iraq is to bring "security and stability" most notably Baghdad. What tactics will be used to bring about such results? One of the aims of the troop beef up in Baghdad will be to disarm the Militias including that of Muqtada Al-Sadr: the Mahdi Army. From Oped News:

"The President has clearly indicated that unlike in the past when the US refrained from disarming Shia militias and taking actions against them, the US now intends to act against them. His exact words on this score were: "In earlier operations, political and sectarian interference prevented Iraqi and American forces from going into neighborhoods that are home to those fueling the sectarian violence. This time, Iraqi and American forces will have a green light to enter those neighborhoods - and Prime Minister Maliki has pledged that political or sectarian interference will not be tolerated."

The Mahdi army being Shia has a considerable amount of support from Shia Iran. One might argue that this is the reason for the Patriot missile deployment. However, Iran did not launch missiles in retaliation to the battle of Najaf in which US forces took on the Mahdi Army.

More reason than any that the U.S. deaths have remained so low, is that the Sunni and Shia have been at each other's throats and not ours. To turn on the Shia militias will certainly lead to many casualties. The last thing the US forces need to do is create more enemies, especially when those enemies were previously your allies:

"U.S.-led forces detained five Iranians Thursday after a raid on a government office flying an Iranian flag, Iraqi officials and witnesses said, as President Bush vowed to isolate Iran and Syria as part of a new strategy to quell violence in Iraq.

ABC News, quoting Iraq's Foreign Minister Hoshyar Zebari, reported that U.S. forces tried and failed later Thursday to seize more people at Irbil's airport. That raid resulted in a tense, armed standoff with Kurdish peshmerga militia forces, the television news organization said.

"There weren't any casualties, but it was a split second really for a disaster to happen," Zebari told ABC News."


So it seems inevitable that war with Iran means the decimation of our forces in Baghdad as they will be fighting not only the Sunnis, but also the Kurds, the Shia of Iraq and Iran. The occupation of Baghdad depends upon a supply line coming from Kuwait in the South. These could easily be cut off by Iranian and/or Shia militias.

The Neo-Conservative strategy of "order out of chaos" has been turned up full throttle.

Lastly, there is Russia and China who have remained on the side-lines as the Neo-Cons carry out their suicidal push for global domination. Russia was not at all happy with the raid on the Iranian liaison office:

"Russia's foreign ministry said on Friday a raid by U.S. troops on an Iranian government office in northern Iraq was unacceptable and a violation of international rules.

"It is absolutely unacceptable for troops to storm the consular offices of a foreign state on the territory of another state," the ministry said in a statement posted on its web site.

"This is a flagrant violation of the Vienna convention on consular relations. It is also not clear how this fits in with American statements that Washington respects the sovereignty of Iraq," it said.


And: China has business interests within Iran:

"A Chinese official says the United States should not interfere in China's relations with Iran. The comment came after the U.S. expressed concern about a Chinese oil company's plans to invest in an Iranian oil field, at a time when Tehran is defying the United Nations over Iran's nuclear program. Daniel Schearf reports for VOA from Beijing.

China's Foreign Ministry spokesman, Liu Jianchao, says China has every right to do business with Iran, and the U.S. has no right to comment on the two countries' dealings."


In the event tactical-nuclear weapons are used against Iran, it is highly likely that China and/or Russia would then also be involved as a pre-emptive nuclear strike on a non-nuclear country is a war crime of the highest degree and threatens their future as well. The Axis in World War II made very unlikely allies come together to fight a common foe.

The Neo-Crazies and their puppet mouthpiece Bush, have doubled-down their insane scorched Earth policy; it's either United States global hegemony or bust. Unfortunately, both outcomes will have catastrophic effects felt globally unless they are stopped.



The Ties That Bind China, Russia And Iran

Putin To Olmert: Using Force Against Iran Could End In Disaster

The Coming Showdown In Iran

Israel, Iran, Mossad And A Nuclear False Flag Attack

Imminent US Attack On Iran?

The War Against Iran And Possible False Flags





Revealed: Israel Plans Nuclear Strike On Iran

Source

Israel has drawn up secret plans to destroy Iran’s uranium enrichment facilities with tactical nuclear weapons.

Two Israeli air force squadrons are training to blow up an Iranian facility using low-yield nuclear “bunker-busters”, according to several Israeli military sources.

The attack would be the first with nuclear weapons since 1945, when the United States dropped atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The Israeli weapons would each have a force equivalent to one-fifteenth of the Hiroshima bomb.

Under the plans, conventional laser-guided bombs would open “tunnels” into the targets. “Mini-nukes” would then immediately be fired into a plant at Natanz, exploding deep underground to reduce the risk of radioactive fallout.

“As soon as the green light is given, it will be one mission, one strike and the Iranian nuclear project will be demolished,” said one of the sources.

The plans, disclosed to The Sunday Times last week, have been prompted in part by the Israeli intelligence service Mossad’s assessment that Iran is on the verge of producing enough enriched uranium to make nuclear weapons within two years.

Israeli military commanders believe conventional strikes may no longer be enough to annihilate increasingly well-defended enrichment facilities. Several have been built beneath at least 70ft of concrete and rock. However, the nuclear-tipped bunker-busters would be used only if a conventional attack was ruled out and if the United States declined to intervene, senior sources said.

Israeli and American officials have met several times to consider military action. Military analysts said the disclosure of the plans could be intended to put pressure on Tehran to halt enrichment, cajole America into action or soften up world opinion in advance of an Israeli attack.

Some analysts warned that Iranian retaliation for such a strike could range from disruption of oil supplies to the West to terrorist attacks against Jewish targets around the world.

Israel has identified three prime targets south of Tehran which are believed to be involved in Iran’s nuclear programme:

*Natanz, where thousands of centrifuges are being installed for uranium enrichment

*A uranium conversion facility near Isfahan where, according to a statement by an Iranian vice-president last week, 250 tons of gas for the enrichment process have been stored in tunnels

*A heavy water reactor at Arak, which may in future produce enough plutonium for a bomb Israeli officials believe that destroying all three sites would delay Iran’s nuclear programme indefinitely and prevent them from having to live in fear of a “second Holocaust”.

The Israeli government has warned repeatedly that it will never allow nuclear weapons to be made in Iran, whose president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, has declared that “Israel must be wiped off the map”.

Robert Gates, the new US defence secretary, has described military action against Iran as a “last resort”, leading Israeli officials to conclude that it will be left to them to strike.

Israeli pilots have flown to Gibraltar in recent weeks to train for the 2,000-mile round trip to the Iranian targets. Three possible routes have been mapped out, including one over Turkey.

Air force squadrons based at Hatzerim in the Negev desert and Tel Nof, south of Tel Aviv, have trained to use Israel’s tactical nuclear weapons on the mission. The preparations have been overseen by Major General Eliezer Shkedi, commander of the Israeli air force.

Sources close to the Pentagon said the United States was highly unlikely to give approval for tactical nuclear weapons to be used. One source said Israel would have to seek approval “after the event”, as it did when it crippled Iraq’s nuclear reactor at Osirak with airstrikes in 1981.

Scientists have calculated that although contamination from the bunker-busters could be limited, tons of radioactive uranium compounds would be released.

The Israelis believe that Iran’s retaliation would be constrained by fear of a second strike if it were to launch its Shehab-3 ballistic missiles at Israel.

However, American experts warned of repercussions, including widespread protests that could destabilise parts of the Islamic world friendly to the West.

Colonel Sam Gardiner, a Pentagon adviser, said Iran could try to close the Strait of Hormuz, the route for 20% of the world’s oil.

Some sources in Washington said they doubted if Israel would have the nerve to attack Iran. However, Dr Ephraim Sneh, the deputy Israeli defence minister, said last month: “The time is approaching when Israel and the international community will have to decide whether to take military action against Iran.”



The London Times Says "Sampson Option"

The Samson Option - Israel's Preemptive Strike

Israel Says It Plans An Iran Attack

Former US Intelligence official: Israel Will Attack Iran

Israelis Denounce Reports Of Plan To Strike Iran

Israel Denies Claims It's Preparing Nuke Attack On Iran

Israel's Nuclear Missile Threat Against Iran

Deja Vu: Israel Denies Plans To Attack Iran

Deja Vu: 'Israel Won't Attack Iran'

Deja Vu: Israel Rules Out Pre-Emptive Strike On Iran

Peres: Israel Has No Intention Of Attacking Iran

Deja Vu: Attack Iran The Day Iraq War Ends, Demands Israel

Deja Vu: Israeli Aides Warn US Not To 'Drop Ball' On Iran

Are Israelis Gearing Up To Bomb Iran?

What To Do With Iran?

Israel Prodding U.S. To Attack Iran

Israeli Think Tank Says Only Military Strike Will Stop Iran

Israeli General Suggests To Use Azerbaijan's Airbases In Strike Against Iran

Mission Iran

Israel Likely To Concentrate On Major Targets In Iran

US Report: Israel Would Weather Nuclear War With Iran

Israel: Nuclear Iran Is Threat To Whole World

Why Is Iran Everyone Elses Problem?

Iran Is Israel's Problem

New UN Chief - Israel At The Heart Of The Problem

The Maps Tell The Story

Iranian Jews Reject Outside Calls To Leave

Israel's Domestic Political Game Raises The Danger Of A US-Iran War

Four-In-Ten Americans Predict War With Iran

Poll: Forty Percent Of American Voters Believe The Israel Lobby Has Been A Key Factor In Going To War In Iraq And Now Confronting Iran

Israel, Lobby Pushing Iran War

Hawkish Israeli Lobby Wants War With Iran

Lobbying On Iran - Groups Strive To Play Down The Jewish Angle

Jewish Groups To Bush: Drop Iran-Israel Linkage

Iran-Israel Linkage By Bush Seen As Threat

Holy Warriors Set Sights On Iran

Onward Zionist Soldiers

Zionists And US Neo-Conservatives Plan To Divide Iran

The Zionist Plan For The Middle East

More On The Zionist Plan

The Clash Of Civilizations?

After Saddam: One Down, One To Go?

Iran Warns Israel After Netanyahu Attack Threat

Iran Issues Warning To Israel Over Reported Nuke Threat

Iran Will Give Unforgettable Lesson To Israel If It Ventures Into Targeting Nuclear Sites

Iranian Hard-Line Cleric Warns Israel To 'Fear' Long-Range Missiles

Israel Has Lost




"If the only credible solution to Iran acquiring nuclear weapons is an airstrike to destroy their facilities, we are far better able to do it than the Israelis. The worst thing would be to attack and not succeed."

Richard Perle

Deja Vu

Iran: The Next Neocon Target

Prisoner's Dilemma In Tehran

Who Decides On War With Iran?

Attacking Iran: I Know It Sounds Crazy, But...

This Draft Shows Who Is Running America's Policy...Israel

Mossad Chief: US To Be Mired In Middle East In Perpetuity

Iranian Nuclear Bomb 'Flying Gas Chamber'

Bomb Iran

Bush 'Viewed War In Lebanon As A Curtain-Raiser For Attack On Iran'

The Military’s Problem With The President's Iran Policy

Johnny Apple

US Hawks Smell Blood

Neocons Resurrect Plans For Regional War In The Middle East

The Drums Of War Sound For Iran

The Coming War With Iran

Iran Backed Dangerously Into A Corner

'You Just Want War, War, War, And You Want Us In More War’

America's One-Eyed View Of War: Stars, Stripes, And The Star Of David

Olmert: Iraq War Was Good For Israel

The US War On Iraq: Yet Another Battle To Protect Israeli Interests?

Clean Break Or Dirty War? Israel's Foreign Policy Directive To The United States

A Clean Break: A New Strategy For Securing The Realm

Zionists And US Neo-Conservatives Plan To Divide Iran

Kristol Suggests People Of Iran Would Embrace US Attack, Triggering Regime Change

Cakewalks And Walks In The Park

The Spies Who Pushed For War

A New Perle Harbor: Neocon Foreign Policy Architect Richard Perle Reveals US War Plans In The Iranian Theater



Now Introducing The Office Of Iranian Affairs (Formerly Doing Business As The Office Of Special Plans)

Israeli Spies Active In Iran

Deja Vu: Iranian Jew Admits Spying

Israeli Spies In Iran Told Of Test Of Nuclear Bomb Triggers

Intelligence Officials Doubt Iran Uranium Claims - Say Cheney Receiving Suspect Briefings

US Iran Report Branded Dishonest

Seeking Iran Intelligence, US Tries Google

Cooking Intelligence - Again

Behind The Iraq Dossier Hoax: Intelligence Was Cooked In Israel

Israel Reports Weapons Development in Iran, Iraq

Exiles Lay Charges: 'Iran Tunnels N-Secrets'

DEJA VU: Saddam Used Underground Tunnels To Smuggle WMDs Into Syria

Israel: 'Iran At Nuclear Point Of No-Return By March'

DEJA VU: Saddam 'Is Months Away From A Nuclear Bomb'

Israel Knew Iraq Had No Nuclear Weapons

Iran's Fanatical Regime Threatens London As Well As Israel

DEJA VU: Saddam's Regime A threat To Britain

Iranian Weapons Arm Iraqi Militia

Deja Vu: ABC And The IED's From Iran That Were Made In The UK

Iran A 'Major Threat' Says Blair

Deja Vu: Blair Reveals Why Iraq Is A Threat

More Zionist Propaganda

Straight From The Horse's Mouth

Selective Memri

The Long Tradition Of Wars Based On Lies

Why Are We Surprised By War Lies?

Folks, We Are Being Set Up Again





"The war in Iraq was conceived by 25 neoconservative intellectuals, most of them Jewish, who are pushing President Bush to change the course of history."

Ari Shavit




Weapons Of Mass Deception

Written by Jim @ PlanetQuo - 6th September, 2006


And so it came to pass that the apocalypse scheduled for August 22nd failed to materialise, and Mahmoud Ahmadinejad didn't wipe Israel ' off the map' as Bernard Lewis Joel C. Rosenberg, and an assortment of other pro-Israel Neoconservative propagandists and sympathisers had prophecised. Every last one of them now looks as foolish as arch-Neocon and 'total-war' proponent Michael Ledeen did three years ago when he tried to pull the same trick. The people who brought us war in Iraq will soon be bringing us war with Iran - a war where the use of nuclear weapons is being advocated.

Ledeen, for a variety of reasons, had already come to my attention but I was none too familiar with Bernard Lewis prior to reading his amusing article in the Wall Street Journal. I did some background research on him and discovered that he is held in very high esteem by Neoconservatives. Lewis is considered to have been an 'inspiration' for the invasion of Iraq. I also discovered that the professor was in the employ of British intelligence between 1940-45 and counts convicted fraudster Ahmed Chalabi among his friends. Bernard Lewis has kept some appallingly bad company over the years, and if you lie down with dogs, you'll rise with fleas. Lewis is riddled with Neocon parasites and in dire need of a thorough delousing.

That Dick Cheney felt it necessary to commandeer Air Force Two to travel to Philadelphia for a speaking engagement in celebration of Lewis's 90th birthday is testament to the level of influence that the professor exudes within Neoconservative circles, and of how revered he is by his disciples.

Bernard Lewis is professor emeritus of Middle Eastern and Ottoman Studies at Princeton University, New Jersey, and is considered by some to be: the world's foremost historian of Islam." Lewis's perception and interpretation of Arabs, however, and his analysis of middle-east politics alarm me. He doesn't get much right, does he? Is this what Bernard Lewis had in mind when he plucked the phrase 'clash of civilizations' from the relative obscurity of a 1993 Council On Foreign Relations report and made it mainstream terminology? Is this what professor Lewis foresaw? Did he anticipate ethnic cleansing? Was this his model Iraq?




Michael Hirsh's excellent Washington Monthly article of November 2004 offers interesting insight into the workings of the professor's mind. Hirsh states that during an interview that took place in the Spring of 2004, Lewis told him that he had: "no doubt that September 11 was the opening salvo of the final battle." I concur with Lewis on this particular point. I too have no doubt that 9-11 was the opening salvo'that kicked-off the "final battle." But wasn't a 'clash of civilizations' precisely the outcome that the planners of 9-11 had intended?

Former US president Franklin D. Roosevelt observed: "in politics, nothing happens by accident. If it happens, you can bet it was planned that way." Amen. The nexus of politics and terror. The nexus of smoke and mirrors, the nexus of 9-11, Iraq, PNAC, and a network of roads that lead to Israel. Take a look at the evidence, examine the clues, connect the dots. Israel had the means, the motive, the opportunity. Israel has a proven track-record in carrying-out acts of terrorism. When it comes to terrorism, Israel is a past master. The State of Israel was founded on terrorism yet if one were foolish enough to believe the spiel of pro-Israel propagandists such as Joel C. Rosenberg then one would hold Yassar Arafat to be "the godfather of modern terrorism," and not David Ben-Gurion. Besides, one man's freedom fighter is another man's terrorist.

There exists ample evidence in support of the premise that Israel were the masterminds of the 9-11 attacks on New York and Washington and not 'Al-Qaeda'. One need not be a seasoned dectective to arrive at this conclusion. Forget all about 'Al-Qaeda', Osama bin Laden and 'Islamic terrorists' being the perpetrators of the mass-murder that took place on September 11th 2001. Hijackers? Arab hijackers? What Arab hijackers? Now who would go to such great lengths to ensure that incriminating 'evidence' implicating Arabs was left lying around? Who are the real terrorists?



Why did those Israelis dance so merrily after the north and south towers of the World Trade Centre had been hit? Of greater importance, how did they did know that an attack was imminent? Did Odigo send them a message? Rupert Murdoch perhaps? Maybe Saddam tipped the Israelis the wink. Saddam was behind 9-11. Right? Iraq was involved in 9-11. Right? Saddam Hussein was 'linked' to Al-Qaeda. Right? Saddam had weapons of mass destruction in 2003. Right? And who supplied Saddam with his deadly arsenal? Who built a research reactor in Tehran in the 1960s and supplied the weapons-grade Uranium needed to power the facility?




The Iraq war was conceived in Israel and subsequently waged on Israel's behalf. The war in Iraq is a war for Israel. War in Iraq is good for Israel. The withdrawal of US troops from Iraq would be bad for Israel. Israel clearly benefits from the Anglo-American invasion of Iraq. The US miltary now fights Israel's wars and supplies the cannon-fodder. This is indeed quite an extraordinary relationship - a rose by another other name. The United States of Israel, the US of Z. Israel will also benefit from war with Iran, and that's why their agents are pulling-out all the stops to generate support for the forthcoming attack. The people who fooled us into supporting war with Iraq are the same people who are now working ever so hard to try and deceive us yet again.




Like his fellow 'apocalypse-believer' Bernard Lewis, Rosenberg has kept some truly despicable company. He is a former speechwriter for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and a former aide to Deputy Prime Minister Natan Sharansky. Sharansky is a commited Zionist who lists the likes of Elliott Abrams, Richard Perle, Paul Wolfowitz, Douglas Feith, and the disgraced I. Lewis 'Scooter' Libby among his "closest friends and collaborators in the United States." The architects of war - where are Sharansky's friends and collabarators now? And where too is Rabbi Dov Zakheim and the trillions of dollars that went missing from the Pentagon during his watch? Why was Zakheim never arrested? And why has this dubious character also been allowed to escape justice?

Even by Zionist standards Benjamin Netanyahu is a nasty piece of work. Netanyahu is the ideological architect of the war on terror doctrine. Indeed, it was he who coined the phrase 'war on terror'. When asked what the 9-11 attacks meant for relations between the US and Israel, Netanyahu replied, "It's very good," before correcting himself with: "well, it's not very good, but it will generate immediate sympathy (for Israel)." Well, there can be little doubt that 9-11 worked the oracle in winning Israel the sympathy vote. The effect of 9-11 was indeed immediate. And if Netanyahu was on the money, then his close friend Larry 'Pull It' Silverstein was in the money. For Larry Silverstein, 9-11 was the goose that laid the golden egg.

Joel C. Rosenberg is an evangelical Christian of Jewish Orthodox background. In other words, Rosenberg is a Christian Zionist - and we know which corrupted hymn-sheet he and his souless band of demented, apocalyptic pro-Israel nut-jobs sing from. Christians beware, Tel Aviv wants you as a sunbeam. When he is not touring America's evangelical belt promoting his anti-Islamic propaganda, Rosenberg finds time to write 'political thrillers' that have been described by one reviewer as "an act of terrorism on the reader's brain", and "not very good" by another. I haven't read any of Rosenberg's 'thrilling' novels nor do I ever intend to. That Sean Hannity, Rush Limbaugh, and his brother David give Rosenberg's debut novel 'The Last Jihad' such glowing endorsements is reason enough for me to do a raincheck. Rosenberg is a frequent guest on The Sean Hannity Show, FOX News, CNN, and Rush Limbaugh's Radio show. He also worked as a researcher for Rush Limbaugh - proof-positive that some people will do anything for money.

The plot of 'The Last Jihad' begins inside the cockpit of a jet that has been hijacked by radical Islamic terrorists. The bad guys intend to use the jet as a guided missile in a suicide-attack. This kamikaze assault leads to the US declaring war with Saddam Hussein over weapons of mass destruction. But is Rosenberg the prophet that some proclaim him to be? Was Rosenberg seeing the same warning-signs that documentary film-maker and talk-radio show host Alex Jones was seeing? Obviously not.

Alex Jones attaches blame for the 9-11 attacks on Globalists while Rosenberg lays the blame on Islamic terrorists led by Osama bin Laden. Rosenberg is dead wrong but that in itself does not necessarily make Alex Jones right. Jones has made several public statements claiming that Israel could not have carried-out 9-11. While Rosenberg and Jones are poles apart on who the perpetrators of 9-11 were, both, however, are by default in agreement that it wasn't Israel.

I am perplexed as to how Alex Jones can unequivocally state that Israel could not have carried-out the 9-11 attacks. The research that I have conducted over the last two years flatly contradicts this assertion. So too does the work done by Dr. Albert D. Pastore, Christopher Bollyn, Eric Hufschmid, Micheal Rivero, and Justin Raimondo. The lie that just won't die? How obvious does it need to be?

Rosenberg was recently a guest on Jones' radio show, and their discussion is well worth a listen - if only to witness how Rosenberg consistently projects blame onto Muslims and how Jones deflects blame away from Israel. During the interview, Rosenberg denies that it has ever been said that Iran could be "wiped off the map". This is a demonstrable lie, and one can but wonder why Jones did not call him on this issue. I doubt very much if fellow broadcaster Charles Goyette would have missed such a diamond opportunity to out Rosenberg for the liar that he is.

Rosenberg rose to prominence by writing about 'Islamic terrorists' carrying-out suicide-attacks inside America using a hijacked jet as the attack weapon nine months in advance of 9-11. Oddly enough, Alex Jones also found popularity and credibility by predicting a terrorist attack on American soil. Jones predicted 9-11 two months before it happened. Daryl Bradford Smith is highly critical of Alex Jones, and Jones is equally as scathing in his criticism of Smith. Smith to his credit though at least names Jones when referring to him whereas Jones refuses to do likewise.

Fintan Dunne is another staunch critic of Alex Jones. Dunne accuses Jones of being a disinformation agent, and ridicules his latest prediction of a 'false-flag' terror attack that Jones believes has a 90% chance of happening before the end of October. Alex Jones though, is not the only Christian who is predicting another massive terrorist attack inside American.

Rosenberg lied when he stated during his interview with Alex Jones that "it has never been stated that Iran could be wiped of the map". Rosenberg continues to lie and deceive whenever he accuses Mahmoud Ahmadinejad of saying that he wants to "wipe Israel off the map." Ahmadinejad has never said what Rosenberg claims he said. The Iranian president's comments on Zionism and the holocaust have been grossly distorted by Rosenberg and his fellow Neocon propaganda merchants.




In Rosenberg's distorted thinking, Iran is the "new Germany," President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has replaced Saddam as the "new Adolf Hitler," Shiite Muslims are the new Nazi stormtroopers, and the pursuit of the Twelfth Imam is "the pursuit of the new Third Reich." Seig heil. All bow to the Iranian master-race. Whatever next? Will Jews now be forced to sew yellow strips of cloth to their clothes? Was the Iranian government seriously considering implementing such an overtly racist and discriminatory policy or is this yet another dirty lie? Yet another hoax? Yet another example of shameless propaganda? Yet another example of nauseating hypocrisy? As the photograph below adequately demonstrates, today's 'Islamo-fascists' were yesterday's friends.



Ronald Reagan meets with Afghan Mujahideen in the White House on 2nd February, 1983


If Joel C. Rosenberg is seriously concerned by the real and present danger that Fascists, Nazis and the new Reich pose to the American people then he should refrain from attempting to demonise Iran, develop a broader understanding of history, and focus his research a bit closer to home. Better stilll, he and Donald Rumsfeld best shut-up and leave discussions on Fascism and Nazism to commentators of greater intellectual ability




And If we do indeed have a "new Hitler" in our midst, then president George W. Bush is a better-qualified candidate to be Fuhrer than is president Mamhoud Ahmadinejad or Osama bin Laden. Which of the two presidents has publicly stated that he would like to be a dictator? Which of the two president's Grandfather was a Nazi financier? Which of the two presidents is responsible for botched wars in Afghanistan and Iraq? Which president provides the greatest threat to world peace? President Ahmadinejad or president Bush? The president of the United States of America or the president of Iran? Moreover, who is responsible for the worst terror-attacks in history? And who poses the greatest threat of nuclear anihilation to the United States? Why is Joel C. Rosenberg not criticising North Korea and China with the same venom that he spits at Iran?

Rosenberg informs us that "America was blinded by Hitler in the 1930s." True, some Americans were indeed oblivious to the danger of the Nazis - and many still are - but others were wide-awake and knew of the threat posed by Hitler yet did nothing to counter that threat. Without the financial support given by Wall Street, the logistical support provided by IBM, and the collaboration of Nazis and Zionists, World War II could not have occurred, and Hitler's crimes against humanity would not have taken place. Neither would have the war crimes committed by America and her allies.

Absent World War II, SIXTY-ONE million people would not have been slaughtered, there would have been no death camps, and there would have been no holocausts - and without holocausts there would be no Zionist State of Israel, and, ultimately, no possibility of a future 'Greater Israel'. Go figure it out for yourself - assuming that you live in a country where the thought-crime of questioning the conventional view of history does not lead to imprisonment as it does in some of those that mistakenly call themselves 'democracies'.

To quote former US Secretary of State Colin Powell, "it is not anti-semitic to criticise the policies of the state of Israel," yet there seems not to be one single issue where criticism of Israel isn't considered to be 'anti-semitism'. The Jewish community in Britain aren't the only people under attack. Scurrilous accusations of 'Anti-Semitism' will not deter this website in its criticism of the racist, genocidal policies of the state of Israel, and the deception it uses to help spread its propaganda. War crimes are war crimes are war crimes regardless of who commits them.

Harry S. Truman once said that, "there is nothing new in the world except the history you do not know." Amen. Truer words were never spoken - and what if everything you believed was a lie? George Bernard Shaw observed that "we learn from history that we learn nothing from history." There are, however, two things that we do know about history: history has a quirk of repeating itself, and second, those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it.




If you've been getting your news from the corporate media, I have some very important advice to pass to you - SHUT-UP AND LISTEN. You were fooled into supporting the Gulf War, and you were fooled into supporting the current war in Iraq. If you do not awaken from your slumber you will be fooled yet again. Can you really not see? Are you so blind that you do not see who is sending your children off to die in wars? Can you not see who the real enemy is? Know thy enemy. The enemy is inside the gate. The enemy is inside Congress, inside the Senate, and inside the White House. Together they are serving two flags.

The psychopathic warmongers in Washington must be removed from power and brought to justice for their crimes against humanity. The American people must rise-up against the traitors in their midst. This Neoconservative conspiracy against the United States and Iran must be stopped in its tracks otherwise we will all be facing an apocalypse for real. The World is in great peril the way things currently stand. The dark clouds of a third, and, in all probability, a final world war loom ominously.

And should there be any terror attacks between now and the mid-term elections in November just remember the words of Franklin D. Roosevelt - nothing in politics happens by accident.




If One Side In A Conflict Goes Nuclear, The Other Is Bound To Follow Suit

Why Shouldn't Iran Have Nuclear Weapons?

Iranian Nukes Not The Real Issue

No Proof Of Iran Nuclear Arms